WeAreChangeTV.US – Chemical experts sent to the home of Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky who was found dead ‘in bath’…

WeAreChangeTV.US – Chemical experts sent to the home of Russian oligarch Boris Berezovsky who was found dead ‘in bath’…

http://metabunk.org/threads/1149-Phillip-Marshall-9-11-Conspiracy-Theorist-Apparent-Suicide-Or-What?p=34856&viewfull=1#post34856

I misreported “oxycontin” as the pain releiver Phillip Marshall was taking. It should have been “vicodin”. Woops!

Is that what we’re to believe? (See previous post and also the sheriffs’ report bottom of pg 4 and top of pg 5.)

How fortunate it is for the investigators that Phillip Marshall bought one of the only two boxes of that type of ammo in the United States. (Find “corporate office” in the sheriffs’ report.)

And this, after not having any ammo for it at all for the year that he owned the gun (no report of him also buying bullets, two reports on the net that he had no bullets, independent sources and at different times; tarquin at caleveras enterprise (a few days before the deaths) and octagon420 at reddit (a couple of weeks before the deaths)).

[Note: his wife also must have known he had no bullets and also may have had the combination to the safe. There was a note to her inside the safe saying only "Hi Sean!".]

Phillip Marshall must have been a wacked out psychotic madman to ever think he’d get away with this murder-suicide. They don’t even need ballistics tests if they end up being done (after all this time?) and end up being inconclusive (a possibility with this kind of ordnance).

The type of ammo alone proves he did it.

And keep up the great work wearchangetv. This is what journalism is about. Quality assurance. The reason for the first amendment.

And one thing totally lacking from this alleged investigation is “quality”.

Compare:
http://metabunk.org/threads/1149-Phillip-Marshall-9-11-Conspiracy-Theorist-Apparent-Suicide-Or-What?p=36286&viewfull=1#post36286
Which points out some of the problems including the extremely drawn out time line for the test results.

Other countries censor content and not just rogue regimes such as the Iranian mullocracy. Poor people! http://www.baidu.com…

The right to a defense is key to our notion of “establishment of justice” in this nation, and among the elements the founders considered crucial to this proposal, as seen in the US Constitution, Amendment 6, is the right to counsel and compulsory process to obtain witnesses for his defense.

The sheriffs apparently had no interest in defending the accused (Phillip Marshall) and only had an interest in debunking “conspiracy theorists”.

One such conspiracy theorist who has gained the most attention was Wayne Madsen who went to Murphys and investigated this issue himself and concluded that the CIA had executed the man and his kids. The key point and the weakness in his theory was that Marshall was shot in the left temple, though he was right handed. Where did Madsen get this report? Was it the same source that told the Union Democrat that the “official time of death” was when the bodies were found?

So numerous conflicting and/or absurd reports have come out about this case (I’ll call it a “case” because I’m handling Phillip Marshall’s defense in lieu of someone more capable), and since no photographic evidence of the crime scene appears to have been preserved (that we know of) to resolve these conflicting reports, the only evidence we do have is the sheriffs reports themselves, along with some followup media interviews which fill in the blanks or make sense out of the odd sounding parts of the third report. The third report is now two months after the event and which (as mentioned above) was not done before they had already concluded that Phillip Marshall was the shooter and appeared only to bolster their initial reaction to the appearance of the crime scene, which was published within two hours of finding the bodies if the report was typed up during normal business hours (assuming 5 pm).

The date of the first report is the date when the bodies were found.
http://sheriff.co.calaveras.ca.us/Portals/sheriff/Press/2013/Man%20Shoots%20Children%20then%20Himself%20in%20a%20Murder-Suicide.pdf

The update/correction report came out two days later.
http://sheriff.co.calaveras.ca.us/Portals/sheriff/Press/2013/Update-Correction_on_Murder-Suicide.pdf

Then two months passed before the third report.
http://sheriff.co.calaveras.ca.us/Portals/sheriff/Press/2013/Update_Marshall_Investigation.pdf

Phillip was characterized as a drug crazed, mentally ill “truther” in the media, and by the sheriffs themselves. That he was what has been called a “truther” (generally also a “Bush-basher” due to the 9/11 attacks occurring during the Bush administration) is not in dispute. But the evidence suggesting that he was mentally ill and/or drug crazed is weak or non-existent. Moreover, his parenting ability might be better than anyone expected, though this is not pointed out in the investigation. Nevertheless, it can be seen within the supposedly incriminating evidence against him found on the net an in the sheriffs own investigation reports.

Was Phillip Marshal drug crazed?

Phillip had had an alcohol problem in the past but appeared to have cleaned up. The mom, at around the same time had an opiate addiction and she too had apparently cleaned up.

[In 2008] Philip Marshall hid in the shower of his house with a video camera as Sean entered the home and allegedly stole a bottle of six 20-milligram pills of Kadian; a very strong opioid.
The police were called out and eventually arrested Sean Marshall, charging her with petty theft, trespassing and possession of drugs without prescription.
http://wearechangetv.us/2013/02/philip-marshall-lack-of-evidence/

The Calaveras County District Attorney’s Office charged Sean Marshall with petty theft, trespassing and possession of drugs without a prescription. Court records show the case continued in the Calaveras County Superior Court while she attended Alcoholics Anonymous and/or Narcotics Anonymous meetings. After providing an attendance card at a Sept. 28, 2009, hearing, all charges against her were dismissed.

http://www.uniondemocrat.com/News/Local-News/More-murder-suicide-details

Philip and Sean Marshall/Plummer both appeared to have resolved their drug/alcohol issues by early 2009. The conflicts and previous divorce issues arose during the time prior to them “getting on the wagon”. And the previous divorce proceedings were also dropped and the marriage continued up until a few months before they split up and Phillip moved back into his own home.

Why did Sean want a divorce again? Why was a note to Sean found in Phillips safe saying “Hi Sean” on a bag of marijuana? And why were the drugs in a safe in the first place?

This reflects on Phillip Marshall as a former airline captain and a parent: Were the drugs in the safe to keep the kids out of them (all of which were legally prescribed, including the marijuana)?

If they were not in the safe to keep the kids out of them it was to keep the mom, Sean Marshall/Plummer out of them. She’d robbed drugs from him before.

As Phillip has a right to a defense, it should be pointed out that if keeping the drugs, gun, bullets, etc. in the safe was to prevent the kids from getting into them, this suggests that he was a careful, caring parent.

Why the details about the safe were not forthcoming in a more timely manner (such as in the first or second media releases of their reports) is unknown. The last update comes two months after the first two hasty conclusions and gives the impression that the public had no right to know how they arrived at their conclusions.

Conclusions such as the snap decision that Phillip Marshall shot his kids in the living room, then the dog in the master bedroom and then himself back in the living room again. (If the dog was shot first, the kids could not have been “sleeping”.)

Was Phillip Marshall mentally ill?

That Marshall was taking Welbutrin (the common name) for something appears to be certain from the toxicology results. But what was it prescribed for?

PARENTS: Do you have any kids that are taking Welbutrin? This is indeed the same stuff Phillip Marshall was taking.

Some antidepressants are used to block pain. Welbutrin is not effective for this, and so it makes sense that Marshall would use additional drugs for the chronic back pain he suffered. The morphine and hydrocodone (vicodin) both appear to have been prescribed to him and he appeared to have been using them properly as the amounts in his blood were a tenth the amount of the anitdepressant which itself degrades quickly if not kept at the “coldest possible temperature” before doing a toxicology analysis (according to a wikepedia article on the drug).

The sheriffs reports and interviews point out that Phillip Marshall was required to fill out a contract promising to take the drugs only as prescribed and not to attempt to get additional drugs from another source. This is very likely a standard form. But the “local clinic” that required this agreement was not specified in the report so we can’t verify this. Adding to the difficulty in verifying this using the internet (my only resource) is the fact that there are no “local clinics” in Murphys.

There have been no photographs forthcoming to verify that bedding was present where the kids were allegedly sleeping when shot. (Bedding can also be used as an expedient “suppressor” or silencer.) And no name of the “local clinic” was given in order to verify whether the contract is standard or something special in Phillip Marshall’s case, for some reason.

We are beginning to see a pattern like a game of “keep away” where the sheriffs have the ball and the public is in the middle. All we want is the truth. And we deserve it in a timely manner.

But as is evidenced by the lack of a time of death which was “being evaluated” from day one and is still estimated as being between Thursday night and the Saturday afternoon when the bodies were found, timeliness doesn’t appear to be much of an issue to the sheriffs — or are we to presume a time of death will become more certain after a two month delay.

The two months was apparently necessary to just bifurcate the “official time of death” to possibly include the night before the kids failed to go to school. That is the only change regarding the time in the latest report.

Thursday night the kids quit posting on internet. (Jan 31)
Friday they didn’t go to school. (Feb 1)
Saturday they were found dead at 3 pm. (Feb 2)

This lack of diligence in getting the time of death down to at least within a day is unacceptable. Were the kids drinking on a Thursday night or on a Friday night. Was it night time?

But decibel tests were done on a Saturday morning. Around 10 am. Why? And what time of year was it when the tests were conducted? It had been the cold of winter when they died but was already substantially warmer by the time they released of the third report. (Feb 2 vs. March 29, just one day before April.)

It must have been night time if the kids were indeed sleeping at the time they were shot. Was the dad who was on the wagon aware they were drinking? (The dad was the only one without any alcohol in his toxicology results) What room or rooms was the beer and whiskey found in? Where is the self-portrait Macaila took of herself that night, and what room was she in when she took it?

Most of the above questions can be answered. But if there are no photographs of the crime scene, it is necessary to ask why no ‘evidence’ was preserved photographically because there are still many many unanswered questions about lots of missing details.

What criteria are used to determine whether or not a man is mentally ill or criminally inclined? Is it erratic, irrational behavior? Is it lack of openness, furtive, cagey, suspicious actions? Is it “medical records”?

As we read the third report/update of their investigation and get into the part about “records, medical records and reports” we get the very strong impression that the only “diagnosis” that determined that Phillip Marshall had a bipolar-disorder was the sheriffs own desire to believe it was so.

Are they again playing games with the public or is there actually “evidence” of this that they are not sharing with us.

Here are some of the bizarre statements that result in their conclusion 2 months after the deaths, that Phillip Marshall must have had a bipolar-condition.

1. According to records obtained, Marshall was diagnosed with bi-polar disorder. Additionally, the reports stated that he suffered periods of depression and mania, which led to his dismissal, or “grounding,” as a pilot in September 2006.

Question: Were these or were they not “medical records”? Were they actually just “airline records”? Did a doctor provide the diagnosis? In the 6 years since he was “grounded” had nobody else given the same diagnosis? Wasn’t he supposedly taking medicine for this alleged “bipolar disorder”? Both wives had been interviewed, and both mentioned his temper and impatience, but neither of them used this word. Could it be the sheriffs mistook bipolar-disorder for what was actually adult ADHD? (See “Welbutrin” at wikipedia.) We don’t know. We SHOULD know. But the reason we don’t know is because of the inability or unwillingness of the sheriffs to show the ‘evidence’.

Where did the one “diagnosis” of a bipolar-disorder that was cited actually come from?

2. A search warrant was served at a local clinic for Phillip Marshall’s medical records. The medical records noted that he suffered from chronic back pain, and was prescribed prescription narcotic pain medications for this condition. His medical records suggested that he also suffered from some sort of mental illness, drug dependency, anxiety, and depression.

Question: SUGGESTED? SOME SORT OF MENTAL ILLNESS?

What in the world kind of “medical record” would only suggest that “he also suffered from some sort of mental illness”? Weren’t previous records available to the clinic? Records that had the all-important “diagnosis”, that doesn’t really state anything conclusive, we presume was obtained from a legitimate medical professional?

The likelihood of a prescription being issued for Welbutrin to deal with “some sort of mental illness” is quite a stretch. The only thing consistent with this verdict handed down by the sheriffs is this game of “keep away” with the real evidence.

And so it goes. This is the new and improved “evidence” after the sheriffs determined with certainty that Phillip Marshall shot his kids while they were sleeping on a couch in the living room, then went into the master bedroom and shot the dog, and then went back into the living room and killed himself.

How did the sheriffs “rule out” anyone from outside having committed the murders only hours after the bodies were found? That doors were unlocked in the home should have been known within the first minute after they arrived at the scene.

Has any part of this so called investigation been objective, or has it all been tailored to shape opinions.

Here’s an interview with one of Phillips neighbors, a county supervisor that said she knew Phillip well. How did her mind change from feeling someone must have come into the home to “you never know what goes on behind closed doors”?

Watch Merita Callaway’s statements here.
http://www.calaverasenterprise.com/news/article_71f9b8da-6e27-11e2-99e8-001a4bcf887a.html

Intervew isolating Calloway’s remarks from the rest of the article:

“The actions don’t match the person we know,” said Merita Callaway, a county supervisor who lives four doors up the street from Marshall. She considered him a good friend. “I can’t tell you how many times we’ve had conversations over a cup of coffee together.”

“When I heard what happened, I couldn’t believe it,” Callaway said. “He loved his children.”

She received a call from a sheriff’s captain asking her ‘Do you think this was a murder suicide,” to which she replied, “I had a hard time with it. I truly felt like somebody came in the house.”

“What happened on Thursday that triggered this, if this was a murder suicide?” she asked. “Did he hate his family that much?”

That being said, Callaway said, “I don’t know what happens behind closed doors.”
—- end excerpts

[Note the "Thursday night" reference above.]

Indeed, that is the problem. You never know what goes on behind closed doors and so if the sheriffs have any real evidence, photographs of the crime scene (or artists cleaned up renderings for the public), Macaila’s self portrait, photocopies of the documents they say they have, or knowledge of the exact time of death (see note above), at the very least, the press should be allowed to see them, and better than that, some method of impartial review, because this game of “keep-away” is unacceptable to the public who entrust their safety to law enforcement personnel (see the US Constitution, Preamble).

If they are wrong. The killer(s) are still at large. Think about that for a moment.

And it’s totally unacceptable to my “client”, Phillip Marshall, who has a right to defend his name, even after death, which I have volunteered to attempt, though I never even met that man and I have zero expertise in law, and I have no college education in any subject.

I just a desire that this republic live up to the Constitution that is still the legally binding Supreme Law of the Land.

And because his kids can’t do it for him.

Note: For those who are technically minded, we don’t go into details such as how voids inside voids in blood patterns might not be apparent (like shadows not showing inside other shadows) because indeed we don’t know if the sheriffs even bothered keeping photographic evidence showing anything at all. There is no way to verify their findings and the home was immediately cleaned up. If photos exist that could be analyzed, the sheriffs seem to be playing keep-away with them too for some reason and it’s not worth trying to anticipate their next move in the game they are playing at this time.

ADDENDUM

Autopsy results released on Feb 5 and NOT released on Mar 7.

Released. (See title of article)
http://www.calaverasenterprise.com/news/article_7a125160-6ff5-11e2-9b3b-001a4bcf887a.html
—-
Calaveras County Coroner Kevin Raggio said he determined Philip Marshall and his two children were all killed by a gunshot wound to the head, after performing an autopsy Tuesday morning.
—-

Not Released.
—-
http://wearechangetv.us/2013/03/philip-marshalls-coroner-speaks/#ixzz2MyiJSseO
Chris Gordon noticed that autopsy reports can be purchased for $10. He asked Raggio, “Is it possible that we could purchase an autopsy report for Philip Marshall?”

“I think you could probably, eventually yeah.”

“It’s not available as of yet?”

“Not yet. No.”

“Do you have an idea of when it would be?”

“At this point, No.”
—-

This pertains to differences in the sheriffs’ investigation report that Phillip Marshal was shot in the right side of the head and Wayne Madsen’s report that it was the left side. As of this writing, it’s been almost 10 weeks and it appears that the delays may be deliberate unless the delay is due to getting DNA results. But only the sheriffs know if/when the DNA results will be reported.

It is somewhat awesome you just read your posts, my best mate. Plus i will focus on your web site day after day together with visit your website you just read an individual’s latest content articles, while you update. Carry on with! We imagine you hav…

Re. “Phillip Marshall CIA” on the net.

Previously I analyzed the sheriffs’ report on their alleged investigation of the three deaths in Murphys CA, which supported their initial findings.

If the sheriffs hadn’t concluded that Phillip Marshall was the shooter in an alleged murder-suicide before doing their investigation, I probably wouldn’t be doing this. But they said that persons from outside had been “eliminated” the same day the bodies were found at 3 pm in the afternoon and puzzling inconsistent reports and loose ends remain troubling to this day.

Nobody has control of the evidence but the sheriffs and the coroner. And their investigation appears to be tailored to match their conclusion by cherry picking certain “conspiracy theory” points while not addressing the basic point, that if the man were still alive he’d have an opportunity to defend himself and if he were found innocent the real killer(s) who could still be at large might be apprehended.

The right to a defense is key to our notion of “establishment of justice” in this nation, and among the elements the founders considered crucial to this proposal, as seen in the US Constitution, Amendment 6, is the right to counsel and compulsory process to obtain witnesses for his defense.

The sheriffs apparently had no interest in defending the accused (Phillip Marshall) and only had an interest in debunking “conspiracy theorists”.

One such conspiracy theorist who has gained the most attention was Wayne Madsen who went to Murphys and investigated this issue himself and concluded that the CIA had executed the man and his kids. The key point and the weakness in his theory was that Marshall was shot in the left temple, though he was right handed. Where did Madsen get this report? Was it the same source that told the Union Democrat that the “official time of death” was when the bodies were found?

So numerous conflicting and/or absurd reports have come out about this case (I’ll call it a “case” because I’m handling Phillip Marshall’s defense in lieu of someone more capable), and since no photographic evidence of the crime scene appears to have been preserved (that we know of) to resolve these conflicting reports, the only evidence we do have is the sheriffs reports themselves, along with some followup media interviews which fill in the blanks or make sense out of the odd sounding parts of the third report. The third report is now two months after the event and which (as mentioned above) was not done before they had already concluded that Phillip Marshall was the shooter and appeared only to bolster their initial reaction to the appearance of the crime scene, which was published within two hours of finding the bodies if the report was typed up during normal business hours (assuming 5 pm).

The date of the first report is the date when the bodies were found.
http://sheriff.co.calaveras.ca.us/Portals/sheriff/Press/2013/Man%20Shoots%20Children%20then%20Himself%20in%20a%20Murder-Suicide.pdf

The update/correction report came out two days later.
http://sheriff.co.calaveras.ca.us/Portals/sheriff/Press/2013/Update-Correction_on_Murder-Suicide.pdf

Then two months passed before the third report.
http://sheriff.co.calaveras.ca.us/Portals/sheriff/Press/2013/Update_Marshall_Investigation.pdf

Phillip was characterized as a drug crazed, mentally ill “truther” in the media, and by the sheriffs themselves. That he was what has been called a “truther” (generally also a “Bush-basher” due to the 9/11 attacks occurring during the Bush administration) is not in dispute. But the evidence suggesting that he was mentally ill and/or drug crazed is weak or non-existent. Moreover, his parenting ability might be better than anyone expected, though this is not pointed out in the investigation. Nevertheless, it can be seen within the supposedly incriminating evidence against him found on the net an in the sheriffs own investigation reports.

Was Phillip Marshal drug crazed?

Phillip had had an alcohol problem in the past but appeared to have cleaned up. The mom, at around the same time had an opiate addiction and she too had apparently cleaned up.

[In 2008] Philip Marshall hid in the shower of his house with a video camera as Sean entered the home and allegedly stole a bottle of six 20-milligram pills of Kadian; a very strong opioid.
The police were called out and eventually arrested Sean Marshall, charging her with petty theft, trespassing and possession of drugs without prescription.
http://wearechangetv.us/2013/02/philip-marshall-lack-of-evidence/

The Calaveras County District Attorney’s Office charged Sean Marshall with petty theft, trespassing and possession of drugs without a prescription. Court records show the case continued in the Calaveras County Superior Court while she attended Alcoholics Anonymous and/or Narcotics Anonymous meetings. After providing an attendance card at a Sept. 28, 2009, hearing, all charges against her were dismissed.

http://www.uniondemocrat.com/News/Local-News/More-murder-suicide-details

Philip and Sean Marshall/Plummer both appeared to have resolved their drug/alcohol issues by early 2009. The conflicts and previous divorce issues arose during the time prior to them “getting on the wagon”. And the previous divorce proceedings were also dropped and the marriage continued up until a few months before they split up and Phillip moved back into his own home.

Why did Sean want a divorce again? Why was a note to Sean found in Phillips safe saying “Hi Sean” on a bag of marijuana? And why were the drugs in a safe in the first place?

This reflects on Phillip Marshall as a former airline captain and a parent: Were the drugs in the safe to keep the kids out of them (all of which were legally prescribed, including the marijuana)?

If they were not in the safe to keep the kids out of them it was to keep the mom, Sean Marshall/Plummer out of them. She’d robbed drugs from him before.

As Phillip has a right to a defense, it should be pointed out that if keeping the drugs, gun, bullets, etc. in the safe was to prevent the kids from getting into them, this suggests that he was a careful, caring parent.

Why the details about the safe were not forthcoming in a more timely manner (such as in the first or second media releases of their reports) is unknown. The last update comes two months after the first two hasty conclusions and gives the impression that the public had no right to know how they arrived at their conclusions.

Conclusions such as the snap decision that Phillip Marshall shot his kids in the living room, then the dog in the master bedroom and then himself back in the living room again. (If the dog was shot first, the kids could not have been “sleeping”.)

Was Phillip Marshall mentally ill?

That Marshall was taking Welbutrin (the common name) for something appears to be certain from the toxicology results. But what was it prescribed for?

PARENTS: Do you have any kids that are taking Welbutrin? This is indeed the same stuff Phillip Marshall was taking.

Some antidepressants are used to block pain. Welbutrin is not effective for this, and so it makes sense that Marshall would use additional drugs for the chronic back pain he suffered. The morphine and oxycontin both appear to have been prescribed to him and he appeared to have been using them properly as the amounts in his blood were a tenth the amount of the anitdepressant which itself degrades quickly if not kept at the “coldest possible temperature” before doing a toxicology analysis (according to a wikepedia article on the drug).

The sheriffs reports and interviews point out that Phillip Marshall was required to fill out a contract promising to take the drugs only as prescribed and not to attempt to get additional drugs from another source. This is very likely a standard form. But the “local clinic” that required this agreement was not specified in the report so we can’t verify this. Adding to the difficulty in verifying this using the internet (my only resource) is the fact that there are no “local clinics” in Murphys.

There have been no photographs forthcoming to verify that bedding was present where the kids were allegedly sleeping when shot. And no name of the “local clinic” in order to verify that the contract is standard.

We are beginning to see a pattern like a game of “keep away” where the sheriffs have the ball and the public is in the middle. All we want is the truth. And we deserve it in a timely manner.

But as is evidenced by the lack of a time of death which was “being evaluated” from day one and is still estimated as being between Thursday night and the Saturday afternoon when the bodies were found, timeliness doesn’t appear to be much of an issue to the sheriffs — or are we to presume a time of death will become more certain after a two month delay.

The two months was apparently necessary to just bifurcate the “official time of death” to possibly include the night before the kids failed to go to school. That is the only change regarding the time in the latest report.

Thursday night the kids quit posting on internet. (Jan 31)
Friday they didn’t go to school. (Feb 1)
Saturday they were found dead at 3 pm. (Feb 2)

This lack of diligence in getting the time of death down to at least within a day is unacceptable. Were the kids drinking on a Thursday night or on a Friday night. Was it night time?

But decibel tests were done on a Saturday morning. Around 10 am. Why? And what time of year was it when the tests were conducted? It had been the cold of winter when they died but was already substantially warmer by the time they released of the third report. (Feb 2 vs. March 29, just one day before April.)

It must have been night time if the kids were indeed sleeping at the time they were shot. Was the dad who was on the wagon aware they were drinking? (The dad was the only one without any alcohol in his toxicology results) What room or rooms was the beer and whiskey found in? Where is the self-portrait Macaila took of herself that night, and what room was she in when she took it?

Most of the above questions can be answered. But if there are no photographs of the crime scene, it is necessary to ask why no ‘evidence’ was preserved photographically because there are still many many unanswered questions about lots of missing details.

What criteria are used to determine whether or not a man is mentally ill or criminally inclined? Is it erratic, irrational behavior? Is it lack of openness, furtive, cagey, suspicious actions? Is it “medical records”?

As we read the third report/update of their investigation and get into the part about “records, medical records and reports” we get the very strong impression that the only “diagnosis” that determined that Phillip Marshall had a bipolar-disorder was the sheriffs own desire to believe it was so.

Are they again playing games with the public or is there actually “evidence” of this that they are not sharing with us.

Here are some of the bizarre statements that result in their conclusion 2 months after the deaths, that Phillip Marshall must have had a bipolar-condition.

1. According to records obtained, Marshall was diagnosed with bi-polar disorder. Additionally, the reports stated that he suffered periods of depression and mania, which led to his dismissal, or “grounding,” as a pilot in September 2006.

Question: Were these or were they not “medical records”? Were they actually just “airline records”? Did a doctor provide the diagnosis? In the 6 years since he was “grounded” had nobody else given the same diagnosis? Wasn’t he supposedly taking medicine for this alleged “bipolar disorder”? Both wives had been interviewed, and both mentioned his temper and impatience, but neither of them used this word. Could it be the sheriffs mistook bipolar-disorder for what was actually adult ADHD? (See “Welbutrin” at wikipedia.) We don’t know. We SHOULD know. But the reason we don’t know is because of the inability or unwillingness of the sheriffs to show the ‘evidence’.

Where did the one “diagnosis” of a bipolar-disorder that was cited actually come from?

2. A search warrant was served at a local clinic for Phillip Marshall’s medical records. The medical records noted that he suffered from chronic back pain, and was prescribed prescription narcotic pain medications for this condition. His medical records suggested that he also suffered from some sort of mental illness, drug dependency, anxiety, and depression.

Question: SUGGESTED? SOME SORT OF MENTAL ILLNESS?

What in the world kind of “medical record” would only suggest that “he also suffered from some sort of mental illness”? Weren’t previous records available to the clinic? Records that had the all-important “diagnosis”, that doesn’t really state anything conclusive, we presume was obtained from a legitimate medical professional?

The likelihood of a prescription being issued for Welbutrin to deal with “some sort of mental illness” is quite a stretch. The only thing consistent with this verdict handed down by the sheriffs is this game of “keep away” with the real evidence.

And so it goes. This is the new and improved “evidence” after the sheriffs determined with certainty that Phillip Marshall shot his kids while they were sleeping on a couch in the living room, then went into the master bedroom and shot the dog, and then went back into the living room and killed himself.

How did the sheriffs “rule out” anyone from outside having committed the murders only hours after the bodies were found? That doors were unlocked in the home should have been known within the first minute after they arrived at the scene.

Has any part of this so called investigation been objective, or has it all been tailored to shape opinions.

Here’s an interview with one of Phillips neighbors, a county supervisor that said she knew Phillip well. How did her mind change from feeling someone must have come into the home to “you never know what goes on behind closed doors”?

Watch Merita Callaway’s statements here.
http://www.calaverasenterprise.com/news/article_71f9b8da-6e27-11e2-99e8-001a4bcf887a.html

Intervew isolating Calloway’s remarks from the rest of the article:

“The actions don’t match the person we know,” said Merita Callaway, a county supervisor who lives four doors up the street from Marshall. She considered him a good friend. “I can’t tell you how many times we’ve had conversations over a cup of coffee together.”

“When I heard what happened, I couldn’t believe it,” Callaway said. “He loved his children.”

She received a call from a sheriff’s captain asking her ‘Do you think this was a murder suicide,” to which she replied, “I had a hard time with it. I truly felt like somebody came in the house.”

“What happened on Thursday that triggered this, if this was a murder suicide?” she asked. “Did he hate his family that much?”

That being said, Callaway said, “I don’t know what happens behind closed doors.”
—- end excerpts

[Note the "Thursday night" reference above.]

Indeed, that is the problem. You never know what goes on behind closed doors and so if the sheriffs have any real evidence, photographs of the crime scene (or artists cleaned up renderings for the public), Macaila’s self portrait, photocopies of the documents they say they have, or knowledge of the exact time of death (see note above), at the very least, the press should be allowed to see them, and better than that, some method of impartial review, because this game of “keep-away” is unacceptable to the public who entrust their safety to law enforcement personnel (see the US Constitution, Preamble).

If they are wrong. The killer(s) are still at large. Think about that for a moment.

And it’s totally unacceptable to my “client”, Phillip Marshall, who has a right to defend his name, even after death, which I have volunteered to attempt, though I never even met that man and I have zero expertise in law, and I have no college education in any subject.

I just a desire that this republic live up to the Constitution that is still the legally binding Supreme Law of the Land.

And because his kids can’t do it for him.

Note: For those who are technically minded, we don’t go into details such as how voids inside voids in blood patterns might not be apparent (like shadows not showing inside other shadows) because indeed we don’t know if the sheriffs even bothered keeping photographic evidence showing anything at all. There is no way to verify their findings and the home was immediately cleaned up. If photos exist that could be analyzed, the sheriffs seem to be playing keep-away with them too for some reason and it’s not worth trying to anticipate their next move in the game they are playing at this time.

A corrupt detective has been found guilty of stealing massive amounts of seized drugs and selling them back to drug dealers in a plot that made him and his brother around £600,000.Detective Constable Nicholas McFadden of West Yorkshire police helped h….

Somebody necessarily help to make substantially posts I would mention. This is the very first time I frequented your websites and up to now? I amazed with the analysis you made to make this specific release outstanding. Wonderful job!…

http://www.startribune.com/local/167764165.html?refer=y

Here’s an areal view of the Marshalls’ house.
http://www.bollyn.com/public/Marshall_house_in_Murphys.jpg

The toxicology results should be in any time now. I guess the coroner hopes testing for drugs will make sense out of how the two kids who died on Saturday at 3 pm and/or Thursday night slept through getting shot along with their dog (but not the cat)

On Feb 6 the Union Democrat reports:
—- excerpts
The time of the discovery, 3 p.m. Saturday, will be listed as the official time of death.
—- end excerpts
http://www.uniondemocrat.com/News/Local-News/More-murder-suicide-details

Among other strange details, the above article indicates that the wife whose account is the only person that knew him personally that provided a damaging character reference may have been video taped by Philip Marshall stealing opiates, after which she was arrested for breaking and entering, burglary, and possession of a controlled substance. Is that the ‘nurse’ who had so much to say about the man? But to balance things out the report also points out that someone somewhere who thought he may have been spiraling into depression (which is not substantiated by the consistency of his posts from Jan 12-Jan 31, see twitter link below), and that this same ‘psychology expert’ evidently thinks that 91 percent of all males are likely to commit murder-suicides — or whatever that statistic is supposed to mean.

The sheriffs also allegedly said they’d look into whether or not Marshall was mentally ill and on medication, but that they would not release the results. Probably out of sensitivity for the accused suicide-assassin’s reputation, we might assume.

Fortunately for the sheriffs, their alibi is that their press release is barely what could be called “sketchy”. The press evidently pulled details such as the time of death out of thin air, which would be unnecessary if the coroner actually DID take the liver temperatures or other tests (which might show signs of struggle), as he said he would do. But apparently didn’t.

Note: If the cat was wounded in the senseless slaughter we may never know because the sheriffs quickly destroyed the evidence at the crime scene after their hasty conclusion as to what happened. The sweetest memorial to the family would be if a neighbor found the cat and took it in, I would think. But nobody’s talking up there. It’s almost like the whole area has been “terrorized”.

Dated feb 3.
The Sheriffs’ version:
http://sheriff.co.calaveras.ca.us/Portals/sheriff/Press/2013/Man%20Shoots%20Children%20then%20Himself%20in%20a%20Murder-Suicide.pdf

Dated feb 4.
The Sheriffs’ version:
http://sheriff.co.calaveras.ca.us/Portals/sheriff/Press/2013/Update-Correction_on_Murder-Suicide.pdf

In fact they didn’t tell whether paraffin tests were done, ballistics tests to see if Marshall was indeed the killer. And if the cat was wounded, nobody will ever know. A man this crazed would at least try to kill both of the family pets too, you’d think.

And there’s no mention of photographs that might have been taken prior to the hasty cleanup of the crime scene. It appears that they relied only on ‘evidence found at the scene’, which is NOT specified in the press release. And the only information forthcoming is therefore word-of-mouth, or hearsay.

So we ask, “WHAT EVIDENCE” was the conclusion that nobody else could have killed them all based on? Was there any? Is there any now? And who were the deputies that first advanced the “sleeping while getting shot” theory?

Why wasn’t the fact that he was found laying on top of the alleged murder weapon not mentioned in the press releases?
http://www.modbee.com/2013/02/03/2561671/authorities-murphys-man-kills.html

The coroner said he’d measure their liver temperature to figure out a time of death. The Feb 4th press release suggests that he never even did that.

And then there’s a question as to whether or not he killed any of them, actually.
http://www.calaverasenterprise.com/news/article_71f9b8da-6e27-11e2-99e8-001a4bcf887a.html
tarquin feb 5, 2013
Phil was NOT depressed. He did NOT take his life. He did NOT murder his kids. Only a few days ago he said that “I have a gun, but it would be useless if I needed it because I got no bullets for it”, (then he laughed!). I knew Phil, and he had everything to live for and he doted over his two beautiful kids.

And it appears that the sheriffs themselves may not have been so sure either. For example, why did they contact the county supervisor that lived four doors down from Philip Marshall? Was it to get her opinion or to shape it.
http://www.calaverasenterprise.com/news/article_71f9b8da-6e27-11e2-99e8-001a4bcf887a.html

Since the kids quit responding to text messages on Thursday and they didn’t go to school Friday, the coroner’s theory that the sleeping children were killed on Saturday afternoon (when the bodies were found) may be flawed. And if it is flawed, the most likely times of death would be Thursday.

Here’s Philip Marshall’s twitter page, not broken as of Feb 26, but you might want to download it.
https://twitter.com/thebigbamboozle

Notice that his posts are consistent in their tone from Jan 12 to Jan 31 (the Thursday the family most likely died). One interesting change though is his change from using tmblr.co to fb.me about a week before his death, and another interesting detail is a broken link to an RT.com article that was about rupert murdoch and the movie zero dark thirty.

So the only solid evidence publicly available besides the sheriffs and coroner’s hearsay and unsubstantiated theories appears to contradict their conclusion. Twitter pages, friends posts. Exclude the self contradictory statements of ‘fact’ from the sheriffs’ department including the physical near-impossibility that his body fell on top of the murder weapon.

If they have photos of the crime scene or other evidence that could make sense of their conclusions it would be in the public interest as well as their own to publish that evidence. If they do have this important data, how long should ‘news’ be ‘aged’ before it becomes relevant?

Wayne Madsen scooped the story and has learned that Philip Marshall was right handed and that he died from a gunshot to his left temple. That he was right handed can be verified by photos on the net. That he was shot in the left temple can NOT be verified. And so how did Madsen come across this information and is it even reliable? How does he know? Did he get it from the sheriffs? Not to kick a dead horse, but did they take photos of the crime scene before destroying the evidence or is Madsen now also relaying hearsay as fact.

http://santabarbaraview.com has closed the thread (search “philip marshal victim”), just as the final insult is due in from the lab in Sacramento.

Looks to me like this football field has the field goals, not in the end zones, but at the cheerleaders’ benches.

In any case, Marshall ends one of his articles at the top of this page
http://thebigbamboozle.tumblr.com/page/2
— excerpt
Yet, there is good news. The $15 trillion they have “lost” looking for Osama bin Laden did not vanish from the face of the earth, it simply went to a place where we can’t see it. Thanks to our founding fathers, American citizens come armed with a Constitution, and are backed with judicial and penal systems.
— end excerpt

And there’s your dangerous destroyer of innocent lives he’d spent so many years taking great care to preserve, protect, and defend.

Update:
The mom was interviewed here.
http://www.uniondemocrat.com/News/Local-News/Mom-of-murdered-children-interviewed

She spent a lot of time with the kids’ friends.
— excerpt
Plummer estimated that 20 to 30 teenagers have slept at her Angels Camp home every night since she returned from Turkey, crammed together in a downstairs room she called “The Cave.”

That wasn’t so different from the state of things during Alex and Macaila’s lives, when at least 10 friends would sleep over each weekend.

— end excerpt

She planned to talk at some future time about mental illness and guns.

It is not clear where this ‘mental illness’ diagnosis came from, however, as it appears the Philip Marshall had been given custody of the kids by the courts (unverified but we know where the kids were living).

There’s no indication that Philip tried to limit contact with their mother or refused to let them travel with their mom.

Best wishes and deepest condolences for Seanie’s loss and for her courage in facing the future that she tried to secure for the children.

Tomorrow is another day, mom. Stay strong.

And here’s another tidbit dated a few days before the interview:
http://www.santabarbaraview.com/phillip-marshall-wrote-about-a-conspiracy-was-he-victim-of-one4254252/

— excerpt about 80% down the page
Ann February 19, 2013 at 4:31 pm #

I know the crew who flew his wife home — they were called by the airline and ordered not to speak to her. Why? Very unusual.
— end excerpt

And a theory. It’s my own: Looking at this situation as a black box with nonsense and conflicting information as an input and confusion as an output, what if the sheriffs and coroner are deliberately sounding like mad hatters in order to generate debate about non-issues and “theories”? What if they hope to set the believers and disbelievers against one another in order to assure that justice is derailed?

Then if someone were to feed nonsense into this black box, if they had the brains of a mollusk wouldn’t they try to get the optimal confusion as an output?
Here’s the perfect output. And it took quite some doing to get this so perfectly balanced.
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20040830120349841

“So Chris Kyle lied about something?” Yes. as the article clearly states, Kyle has no basis for his claim and he even changed his story.

“And that undoes any good he ever did for anybody?” Absolutely not. Nobody said that, so try not to assume things that are in your own mind – not mine.

“You also make the error of assuming that Jesse Ventura’s side of the story is fact, and you present it as so. The truth is, neither side was ever proven.” This is like saying 9/11 was not an inside job because it was never proven in court. like syaing the same thing about JFK. Use your common sense and you will come to a common sense conclusion. and as the article states above, the case is going to trial sometime in June. so you will see the truth by then I am sure, if you are a rational person.

“Go ahead and call me a tool, douche, moron, etc. You come off as an insecure man-child. Learn to deal with criticism, and people disagreeing with you. It may help you improve in a lot of areas. You could start with your grammar.” I think your comment says all i need to say about you. Did you actually read the article? I have no problem with constructive criticism but lets be real, the negative comments do not deny anything in the articel except for the fact that Kyle lied. if you think Ventura would do such a thing after everything he has done for the troops, all he has sacrificed and been censored and attacked for – then I think you are full of shit, or this is a rib. isnt it strange where the negative comments come from IP-wise? lol.
If you have some constructive criticims bring it on. Or else please stop trolling. I’ve given you everything you need to know to back up that this is a false accusation. I dont understand how learing to deal with criticism is going to help my grammer but its sad that someone with such poor grammer as me can see the truth where you cannot. Isn’t that sad? What does that tell you?
using common sense one cannot deny that christ kyle lied. and when it comes out, I want you to come back here and apoligize to me. If you are a real man. See you in June.