USWGO Alt New’s Brian D. Hill files response to the Government’s MOTION, had a second child porn set up attempted on him

Share

Note: Posted by a anonymous family member of Brian D. Hill. His family controls his accounts until Brian is off of Supervised Release where he is prohibited from using the Internet no thanks to the corrupt politician and corrupt police that was apart of framing him.

Originally by

Originally sourced from Planet Infowars

Originally posted around February 20, 2015

Brian D. Hill(left), Alex Jones(Center), and Stewart Rhodes(right)

Both Brian and his Appellate Attorney Mark A. Jones filed responses to the U.S. Attorney’s(Government’s) Motion to Dismiss the Appeal. So far the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in Richmond, VA has not ruled on the matter as of yet. It appears that both the Pro Se response and attorney response make multiple fair reasons as to why the Government’s Motion should be dismissed. The U.S. Attorney has attempted to stop Brian’s Appeal as it was the U.S. Attorney that caused Brian to be convicted through usage of a Plea Agreement with the promise of a sentence of Time Served which any prisoner would love to be sentenced under. I guess Brian isn’t too happy with Time Served when under Probation when he feels he is Innocent of the crime he was accused of by the Police.

In the event that Brian’s Appeal is granted that it can have very different impacts that could happen. The Appellate Court could rule to overturn Brian’s criminal conviction or they could even rule for Brian to overturn his guilty plea then allow him to take it back to a trial. Even in the event that his Appeal does fail, he can always file a petition for the Writ of Habeas Corpus Motion proceeding under Title 28 U.S.C. Subsection 2255. He even stated in his 2nd NOTICE OF APPEAL(Doc. 62) that “If the defendant continues being denied his appeal of his conviction, then the defendant plans on overturning his unlawful conviction on Constitutional violations and through Writ of Habeas Corpus Petition also known as a 2255 Motion.”

However some do not view his Appeal or even overturning of his conviction as a good thing and have shown displeasure for Brian appealing his Judgment to overturn his criminal conviction under the possession of child pornography law. Some of those have resorted to threats to setting people up(Susan Basko, Brian’s Attorney, and maybe even as far as his family or friends) with child porn and even seem to go as far as blackmailing him with manufactured evidence to get him to stop his Direct Appeal. I asked Brian about this and he responded with a statement that “An unknown assailant sent a threat to Susan Basko, which she forwarded the text of that threatening email, to which is threatening to charge me and I think my attorney with a child porn charge if I don’t drop my appeal,” and “I think it has something to do with the hard drive released from Mayodan PD last week. That threat scares me but not too much as Basko reporting this threat to the FBI which protects me from being framed again.” The response was through text message so the grammar is not correct. It does sound like blackmail when somebody may be attempting to send illegal pornography to somebody then a anonymous email comes to threaten that very person to drop the appeal or be charged with a sex crime as a result of receiving the illegal pornography by the perpetrator or somebody connected with the perpetrator.

Last week on February 9, 2015, Mayodan Police Department has released some of his property to his Appellate Attorney Mark A. Jones which I believe had given the property to Brian himself on February 11, 2015. Then according to the 6-Page Declaration he reported to his Probation Officer that I believed was sent to me for publishing on Scribd, Brian stated under Oath to have received a laptop internal hard drive in one of the released property boxes from the Town of Mayodan’s Police Department. He looked through the contents of his hard drive looking for memorabilia but instead found child pornography in the appearance of nude children pictures. It looks like his family reacted quickly out of fear and being terrified by destroying the hard drive then disposing of it to protect him from another fabricated(set up, frame up) possession charge in addition to a violation of Supervised Release charge for receiving child pornography from the Mayodan Police Department even though unintentionally. Brian filed the Declaration with Probation to prevent himself from being framed under a Probation violation which was caused by a inappropriate release of evidential property from the Mayodan Police Department. Brian claims to have been set up with child porn again but this time he thinks is by the Mayodan Police Department by release of that 160GB hard drive to him. That hard drive isn’t even on the inventory property sheet which causes more questions that need to be asked. Did Mayodan Police intended for Brian to receive child pornography in a physical hard drive they released to his Appellate attorney during his Appeal of his criminal conviction in the U.S. District Court?

Brian told me in text message that “Somebody from Mayodan Police Department had attempted on Feb 9, 2015 to send me child porn.”

Then also told me that “All will be shown in the documents I am attaching. You must write at least a portion of what all has happened. The Probation officer has been informed and so I am sure she will contact the FBI about this. The b**tards that set me up don’t want an appeal. They make me sick Sheila, I am on the sex offender registry for a crime I never committed.”

So it appears that child porn has been sent to him a number of times in an attempt to frame him with a sex crime to discredit him. With the Mayodan Police as suspect of this latest serial crime of various serial crimes involving child porn set up attempts done to political activists to discredit them and shut them up.

If Brian and his attorney are being threatened with some form of blackmail as a result of unintentionally receiving child pornography in a hard drive released from Mayodan Police Department, would that be considered a frame up all along since Mayodan Police should not have been allowed to possess child pornography that should have been at the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation(NC SBI) since the child porn investigation on Brian was supposed to be done under the State of North Carolina. Brian sent me some photos of the property box that showed me how inappropriately the Mayodan Police attempted to seal the evidence box. Even though the sides look like there was a evidence seal, the other sides show two small holes to make it easier to carry the cardboard box that was supposed to be completely sealed by the Police. Then what even makes his criminal case even more questionable was that the only victim listed against Brian was the State of North Carolina. I guess if he has written news articles that have embarrassed North Carolina and any corrupt politicians in that state then he probably has victimized North Carolina for his crime of exercising his first amendment right as alternative media.

1424419459619 IMG 1423692145934

1424419494657 IMG 1423691310631
free upload image

It appears a cardboard box that big would enough to slip a small hard drive through without it being detected. This may make things difficult when attempting to prove whether Mayodan Police could actually be the culprit or not as the Detective Todd Brim of the Mayodan Police Department can always claim that since the box had the two holes in the sides, anybody can plant the hard drive so maybe nobody can ever be fingered as the culprit for the set up attempt on Brian D. Hill, the former USWGO Alternative News reporter. There is no doubt with what has happened to Brian that he is indeed Innocent and this incident caused by the Mayodan Police Department may further prove actual innocence to the charge that Brian was convicted under.

Keep checking this article for further updates or check for my future articles on the subject.

See Article: Former Alternative Media Head appealing criminal conviction, claimed he was framed with child pornography  
 
 
 

 
Monthly Sale Special FEB 2010  


 

Print Friendly

Speak Your Mind